Analysis report — Altiris Services
Secure before decidingGrid pre-score: 7.6/10
Technical proposal, appendices, certificates, references: every document submitted is read and checked against your need, your grid and your red lines. In the report, every statement cites its source.
Altiris Services
Lyon, FR · Claire V. (claire.v@altiris.example)
Analysis report — Altiris Services
Secure before decidingGrid pre-score: 7.6/10
Executive summary
The bid covers the full required scope: L1/L2 service desk in France, on-site support at all three sites, monitoring of the 80 servers and contractual 24/7 on-call. Its transition methodology is the most detailed in the panel (12 weeks, dated milestones, named team).
Two points hold back the decision: the reversibility plan has no timeline or cost, and the document submitted as an “ISO 27001 certificate” is a draft contract. To be obtained before deciding.
Compliance & red lines
What you hand it
Reading and scoring every bid, on your grid.
Technical proposal, appendices filled in online, certificates, references: it reads every document in the supplier file, without downloading anything. A document from another supplier, or one that doesn’t match its type, comes first.
IT managed services RFP-2027-003
Managed services · Support & operations · Internal client: IT department
Altiris Services
Lyon, FR · Claire V. (claire.v@altiris.example)
Bid analysis
analyzed on receipt · Feb 19The strongest transition plan in the panel — but reversibility isn’t priced, and the ISO certificate submitted needs checking.
Open the full analysis report
Bid V1
Complete ✓Questions / answers
Interactive screen: click its tabs.
Before the score
A bid is judged on its evidence. What is proven, what is only stated, what to ask for: you know before you make the call.
Four documents, checked one by one. One of them isn’t what it claims to be: it flags that before anything else.
What is proven, what is only stated, what is missing: each sub-criterion’s score follows, through a fixed table.
A recommended stance, and the precise questions that would clear its doubts, to put to the supplier.
The questions go to the Q&A if you decide so. When the answers arrive, the analysis runs again on the new documents.
| Sub-criterion | What the document proves | Score |
|---|---|---|
| ISO 27001 certification ISO 27001 certificate — Altiris.pdf | A draft contract, not a certificate | —Undocumented |
| Transition methodology Technical proposal · p. 12 | 12-week plan, dated milestones, named team | 8/10 |
| Comparable references Technical proposal · p. 40 | Cited, no attestation attached | 3/10 |
| Reversibility Technical appendix · p. 6 | Three-phase plan, no schedule or cost | 4/10 |
| L1/L2 support Price schedule · A.1 | Unit price given for 1,200 workstations | 7/10 |
Bid analysis
One point before any score: the “ISO 27001 certificate” uploaded by Altiris is a draft contract. I flag it at the top of the report.
Ask about Altiris Services’ bid…
In the same file
The analysis starts from the evaluation grid, and serves the negotiation.
No. It starts on your click, with the AI model you chose. The report stays saved in the supplier file, and can be rerun when a document arrives.
For each sub-criterion, the agent qualifies what the documents prove (proven, partial, stated without proof, undocumented, contradicted). The score follows from that qualification through a fixed table: the same reading gives the same score from one analysis to the next. You can adjust every score.
A document from another supplier, off-topic, or of a different type than announced (a contract uploaded as a certificate) is flagged at the top of the report, with a cautious stance.
Yes: “Ask the bid” answers from the supplier’s documents, citing its source. What isn’t there is called “undocumented”.
Bring a bid you’ve received: see it analyzed on your grid.
hello@naigo.ai