Consulting, engineering, development, audit, project management support: categories where quality is judged on method, team and references. Naigo reads every bid in full and keeps the decision traceable.
The differences that matter
Naigo lines up the bids and surfaces gaps, anomalies and missing information first.
Naigo’s reading
Nordhaus IT looks €120k cheaper than Altiris Services, but its bid isn’t comparable: 24/7 on-call isn’t priced and two proofs are missing. Altiris and Veltis pass the eliminatory red lines.
Decision view — initial bid
| Comparison point | A Altiris Services | N Nordhaus IT | V Veltis Services |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-year TCO | €1.86M · +€120k | €1.74M · lowest | €1.98M · +€240k |
| Comparable assumptions | Yes | No — to fix | Yes |
| Red lines proven | 2/3 | 1/3 | 3/3 |
| Contract risk | Medium | High | Low |
| Missing documents | 0 | 2 | 0 |
› Show the 28 identical lines
A services bid has to be read. Price alone doesn’t compare it.
Methodology, proposed team, references, service commitments: what matters is in the technical proposal, not in the price schedule. And unproven promises slip easily into a well-written bid. Naigo checks every bid against the need and your grid, separates what is proven from what is merely claimed, and records the decision through to the contract.The internal client describes their need through a link, with no account. “Improve with AI” rewrites it as clear requirements, and the timeline starts from the target start date.
New RFP
Need intake · answers feed the specifications and the scoring grid.
Questions specific to the need
Generated by AI from the need described by the business. Answer, validate each answer, or delete the question.
What support hours do you expect, outside P1 incidents?
Volume: ≈ 1,200 workstations across 3 sites
Monday to Friday, 7 am–7 pm; 24/7 on-call for P1 only.
ValidatedWhich indicators do you want to track each month?
Business problem: resolution times seen as too long
P2 resolution time, first-call resolution rate.
ValidateWhat reversibility period is acceptable at the end of the contract?
Deployment model: fully managed
Your answer…
Validate1/3 answer validated — it feeds the brief and the specifications.
Yes. The RFP workflow is designed for qualitative bids: requirement matrix, technical proposal, references, evaluation panel and presentations.
By qualifying the evidence: for each criterion, it separates what a document proves from what is merely claimed, and the score follows a fixed table. Questionable documents are flagged.
No. Each member scores through a personal link, and their scores feed the consolidated average.
Yes: a slot is scheduled for each supplier, and its status (scheduled, completed, cancelled) is tracked in the RFP.
Bring a contract, a renewal or an upcoming RFP: the demo runs on it.
hello@naigo.ai